..
All photographs taken with a Nikon F or F3 camera
(probably equiped with a 200mm Nikkor lens),
using Agfachrome RS 1000 film.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/13e86/13e8657154ac0793203d704e8c1ce8f745cdeb1c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39257/392576b8cfb0981d723ae3fcb35cc7130af95cda" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46fe3/46fe3934a822e6869b30f6186e95e7ea5eb07d55" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d344b/d344b7dab58f7eded53940052df3ee94889a9d05" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cadb/6cadb7acc9aa71a8b881911b39f64a0c9c1832da" alt=""
On a recent post, I showed some images shot with the old, and long discontinued, Agfachrome RS 1000. As I have stated before, I found it's coarse grain wonderful for some subjects in 120 size, although a little too rough on 35mm film.
A couple of days ago, I happened to find these images taken on the same sessions, using the smaller format, so I thought it would be interesting to post them for you to compare.
I didn't want to fumble with the old slides, so I didn't take them out from the cardboard mounts I used to display them. That is the reason for the brown color of the film frames.
I hope that you enjoy...
P.S.: These photographs make me ponder that color photography has gone a long way, even in a very recent past...
As you know, I am a true film believer, but I must agree that digital easily surpasses (from a technical point of view) film quality at ASA/ISO 1000...
Anyway, I still think that film grain can be a loveable form of expression!
I will forever be a film crusader!!!
..